Comprehensive Plan
I want to begin by thanking all of the stakeholders who came out to Chapel Hill High this morning, a beautifully sunny fall morning, and participated in our first “come together” session in which we heard reports from all of the theme groups on what transpired in their first work sessions. We had over 100 stakeholders participate and we got to hear from about ¼ of you in the discussion portion of the meeting. For those of you who didn’t have time to share your thoughts please think about posting them on either the blog or the web.
Tomorrow morning will mark the first report out session for the six theme groups in Chapel Hill 2020, the process to create the town's new Comprehensove Plan. These report out sessions are designed so that all the theme groups can get together to find areas of agreement and discuss agrees of disagreement. The theme groups have a good deal of overlap, so these large group meetings are necessary to ensure that the plan is cohesive while still being comprehensive.
First, the leadership team will be providing a summary of the process. They’ll give a little more explanation as to where we are and where we’re going in the near future, and they’ll highlight some of the resources available on the web and outreach efforts that are being conducted by the town.
You may have noticed an
editorial in Wednesday’s edition of the Durham Herald-Sun concerning the Chapel
Hill 2020 process. It’s author—Chapel Hill
resident and writer Joe Buonfiglio—points out some conflicts of interest that
may be present in the theme group structure and argues that the public input
process will result in a plan with only “the mere
appearance of citizens running the narrative.” While Mr. Buonfiglio makes some
legitimate points about the weaknesses of the process thus far, I would argue
that the 2020
process features more involvement than past planning
efforts in Chapel Hill and than can be seen in other similarly-sized cities around
the country.
I would label last night’s meeting generally
successful, but reflecting back on what I observed and participated in. Before
I get into my reactions, a quick few notes on what actually happened. The
meeting took place entirely in small groups. As noted above, I participated in
the transportation group. The official title of the theme is:
Getting
Around: Transportation:
(transportation of all forms, regional assets, partnerships, potential for
shared success)
All of the groups basically followed the same
format, kicking off with an introduction by the group go-chairs and then moving
into the meat of the discussion, which was supposed to touch on four different
questions, all with a tilt toward the particular theme’s interest area.
You may have seen my earlier post that described what
theme groups are actually are and what they'll be doing. Tonight, theory
will become reality with the first of the four theme group working sessions at
Ephesus Elementary School. Here's what on the agenda:
- Review the process
- Clarify the roles and responsibilities
of all members and leaders of the group
- Identify the components for the
theme based on the community data collected at previous meetings
- Identify
areas in common with other
themes
- Identify resources for the group,
both in terms of staff and data
- Have discussion of decisions in
the theme group
Pages
About Us
OrangePolitics is a not-for-profit website for discussing progressive perspectives on politics, planning, and public policy in Orange County, NC. Opinions are those of their authors. Learn more.
Community Guidelines
By using this site, you agree to our community guidelines. Inappropriate or disruptive behavior will result in moderation or eviction.
Zircon - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
Design by
WeebPal.
