Immigration, Identity, and Education

The following is an announcement from the Carrboro Cybrary:

On Wednesday, February 1 at 7:00 pm, the community is invited to the Century Center for a discussion about the social, cultural, and political issues surrounding the growth of the state's Hispanic immigrant population as viewed through the context of Esmeralda Santiago's memoir When I Was Puerto Rican .

Latinos living in North Carolina face both tangible struggles involving language and education and more intangible questions of cultural identity and authenticity. The complexities of the immigrant experience are at the heart of Esmeralda Santiago's memoir When I Was Puerto Rican and are the focus of Carrboro's next Community Book Forum. On Wednesday, February 1 at 7:00 pm, the community is invited to the Century Center for a discussion about the social, cultural, and political issues surrounding the growth of the state's Hispanic immigrant population. The discussion will touch on Santiago's book, the current debate surrounding immigrants in the state's higher education system, and the experience of Latinos in our own communities.

You do not need to have read the book to come to the forum!

February's discussion will be the first for the 2006 Community Book Forum, an ongoing series sponsored by the Carrboro Cybrary and the Carrboro Recreation and Parks Department. The forum is an occasional series of discussions that aims to bring people together to discuss books and ideas that are important our community. 2005 was the inaugural year for the series, with forums focused on civil rights, economic development, and mental health awareness. The subject of February's program grew out of discussions at last year's Hispanic Literary Festival, another joint project of the Cybrary and the Recreation and Parks Department. Margot Malachowski, a librarian at the Cybrary and one of the event coordinators, notes that out of all the discussions at the literary festival, the ones about immigrant education were the most spirited. She goes on the comment that, "Education and immigration are core interests within the Carrboro community. In creating this program, we want to give people an opportunity to talk about the complicated barriers that immigrants face in our educational systems."

Santiago's 1993 memoir celebrates a childhood full of learning and survival. After an early childhood spent in the poor, rural barrios of Puerto Rico, the author emigrated to the poor, urban barrios of Brooklyn. While she struggled with language and cultural barriers, Santiago began to excel in the city's educational system, eventually winning at spot at the prestigious New York City High School of the Performing Arts. This poignant memoir is both a touching coming of age tale and a story of the American dream told from an immigrant's point of view. While the discussion will use Santiago's book as a starting point, reading the book is not required for participation in the event. For those interested, copies of the book in both English and Spanish are available at the Cybrary and at local bookstores and libraries.

The event is open to the public but space is limited. Please call the Cybrary at 918-7387 to register in advance. For more information about this and other library programs, please stop by the Cybrary, call 918-7387, or email cybrary@co.orange.nc.us

Tags: 

Comments

This should be interesting. On BBC yesterday, it was reported that NC has the fastest growing Hispanic population in America. John Locke spokesperson said Bush's 'Guest Worker' legislation was 'dead in the water with conservatives'-- I suppose because it gives 'illegals' 'amnestey' for their 'crime.'

It seems I can't go into any store in Durham these days without white clerks making snide remarks about 'those Hispanics'. They say things like 'They are the only ones with money to shop nowadays...' and 'Don't feel sorry for them and believe they are poor... They have plenty of money...' Clearly, some deep seeded resentments are brewing/have been brewing locally.

So Mark, how is the selection process going to work tonight?

We don't know Mary. I had proposed that we use a signed, public record paper ballot that would have all twelve candidates names. One would put a mark next to the candidate of ones choice and we would read out the tally and who had voted which way. This process would have allowed everyone to make strictly affirmative votes (ie you would not be voting against anyone, merely for someone else). But apparently some members of the BOA are unhappy with that notion - because it "lacks transparency" although I do not see how that is so.

So I guess we will entertain a motion or motions from the floor and vote on such motions as may be made. In order to be appointed, one candidate must get 4 affirmative votes (because 3 votes would not be a majority of the six members of the board).

The vote as described is at high risk for being labeled "a done deal"--- but, I suppose any way you decide to vote will be labeled that way by a few vocal critics...
I like the idea of everyone voting for their top six-- no ranking. From that list compile the top three, from there do a rank order vote. You'll probably get the same 'winner' as the way you described, but at least voting this way would give the public some insight into how the BoA evaluated the candidates.

Mary, I've heard people say it's a done deal, but then I've heard people name two or three different candidates who they were sure were going to get the nod. Which makes the deal seem far less done.

Have you heard differently?

I've heard absolutely nothing. I'm very outside the loop-- if there is a loop...

It is not a done deal at this point. There are a number of possibilities. In the past during these types of thing, I have usually known by this point what was going to happen, but this time I think it is really up in the air.

Mark, will you all have a public conversation? (Or has that already happened?) Or, ostensibly anyway, do you just mull over what you heard and vote your own mind individually?

I haven't noticed any obvious front-runners (although there are some clear rear-runners), so I don't see how the selection could be a "done deal."

Is it possible people are saying that because they assume they won't like the outcome and want to cast the vote in an unfair light before they even know the outcome?

I just can't see how anyone thinks this is already decided. Saying so is like displaying closed-mindedness while acusing the Aldermen of the same.

 

Community Guidelines

By using this site, you agree to our community guidelines. Inappropriate or disruptive behavior will result in moderation or eviction.

 

Content license

By contributing to OrangePolitics, you agree to license your contributions under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License.

Creative Commons License

 
Zircon - This is a contributing Drupal Theme
Design by WeebPal.